Assessment system
Assessment system
Assessment system

The undergraduate department of education utilizes the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model of standards for its assessment protocol. These 10 standards hold students accountable to ensure that they are ready for the demands of the classroom, but they also hold the department accountable, ensuring that what we teach and how we teach it is both properly aligned and effective. In addition to the 10 InTASC standards, our department includes one other proprietary standard (standard 11) to ensure that our focus remains on teaching both within a framework of faithfulness and for the glory of our maker. Our standards are listed below:
- The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas. With this understanding in mind, the teacher designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.
- The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards.
- The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
- The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content.
- The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem-solving related to authentic local and global issues.
- The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision-making.
- The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context.
- The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.
- The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.
- The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning; to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth; and to advance the profession.
- The teacher candidate personalizes the departmental “teacher as servant” motto, linking their past educational experiences and future call as an educator to Christ’s embodiment of humble servant.

The undergraduate department of education utilizes the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model of standards for its assessment protocol. These 10 standards hold students accountable to ensure that they are ready for the demands of the classroom, but they also hold the department accountable, ensuring that what we teach and how we teach it is both properly aligned and effective. In addition to the 10 InTASC standards, our department includes one other proprietary standard (standard 11) to ensure that our focus remains on teaching both within a framework of faithfulness and for the glory of our maker. Our standards are listed below:
- The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas. With this understanding in mind, the teacher designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.
- The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards.
- The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
- The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content.
- The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem-solving related to authentic local and global issues.
- The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision-making.
- The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context.
- The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.
- The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.
- The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning; to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth; and to advance the profession.
- The teacher candidate personalizes the departmental “teacher as servant” motto, linking their past educational experiences and future call as an educator to Christ’s embodiment of humble servant.

The undergraduate department of education utilizes the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model of standards for its assessment protocol. These 10 standards hold students accountable to ensure that they are ready for the demands of the classroom, but they also hold the department accountable, ensuring that what we teach and how we teach it is both properly aligned and effective. In addition to the 10 InTASC standards, our department includes one other proprietary standard (standard 11) to ensure that our focus remains on teaching both within a framework of faithfulness and for the glory of our maker. Our standards are listed below:
- The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas. With this understanding in mind, the teacher designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.
- The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards.
- The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.
- The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content.
- The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem-solving related to authentic local and global issues.
- The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision-making.
- The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context.
- The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways.
- The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner.
- The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning; to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth; and to advance the profession.
- The teacher candidate personalizes the departmental “teacher as servant” motto, linking their past educational experiences and future call as an educator to Christ’s embodiment of humble servant.
Student assessment
Student assessment
Student assessment
In addition to the InTASC standards (which are used for both student and programmatic assessment), students are also assessed on their professional dispositions, their overall GPA, their GPA in their major, their grades in individual education courses, and their reviews in clinical placements.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 overall GPA to enter the program and take restricted classes.
- Candidates must maintain the 2.5 GPA to be recommended for student teaching.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 GPA both in their major and overall to be recommended for licensure.
- Candidates must have a C or better in their education courses or risk needing to repeat them.
While candidate assessment is gathered at multiple data points, three gates are part of the formal assessment system:
- Gate 1: Acceptance to the program (usually during the sophomore year)
- Completion of application
- Self-dispositions
- Completion of entrance portfolio
- Entrance interview
- Letter of recommendation from content area faculty (secondary) or education faculty (elementary)
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 2: Application to student teaching (usually during the junior or senior year)
- Completion of 100 clinical hours (assigned, managed and reviewed in various courses)
- Completion of 2 micro-credentials (the diversity micro-credential is required and the other is at the discretion of the student)
- Student teaching application
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 3: Recommendation for licensure (usually at the end of student teaching experience)
- Attendance of student teaching seminars
- Completion of exit portfolio
- Successful completion of student teaching experience
- Completion of student-teaching paperwork
- Completion of exit interview
- Approval by undergraduate department of education
Student data are also examined at informal assessment points including advising sessions each semester in which elementary candidates are assigned to an adviser in the department and secondary candidates are assigned to two advisers, one in their content area and one in secondary education.
In addition to the InTASC standards (which are used for both student and programmatic assessment), students are also assessed on their professional dispositions, their overall GPA, their GPA in their major, their grades in individual education courses, and their reviews in clinical placements.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 overall GPA to enter the program and take restricted classes.
- Candidates must maintain the 2.5 GPA to be recommended for student teaching.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 GPA both in their major and overall to be recommended for licensure.
- Candidates must have a C or better in their education courses or risk needing to repeat them.
While candidate assessment is gathered at multiple data points, three gates are part of the formal assessment system:
- Gate 1: Acceptance to the program (usually during the sophomore year)
- Completion of application
- Self-dispositions
- Completion of entrance portfolio
- Entrance interview
- Letter of recommendation from content area faculty (secondary) or education faculty (elementary)
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 2: Application to student teaching (usually during the junior or senior year)
- Completion of 100 clinical hours (assigned, managed and reviewed in various courses)
- Completion of 2 micro-credentials (the diversity micro-credential is required and the other is at the discretion of the student)
- Student teaching application
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 3: Recommendation for licensure (usually at the end of student teaching experience)
- Attendance of student teaching seminars
- Completion of exit portfolio
- Successful completion of student teaching experience
- Completion of student-teaching paperwork
- Completion of exit interview
- Approval by undergraduate department of education
Student data are also examined at informal assessment points including advising sessions each semester in which elementary candidates are assigned to an adviser in the department and secondary candidates are assigned to two advisers, one in their content area and one in secondary education.
In addition to the InTASC standards (which are used for both student and programmatic assessment), students are also assessed on their professional dispositions, their overall GPA, their GPA in their major, their grades in individual education courses, and their reviews in clinical placements.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 overall GPA to enter the program and take restricted classes.
- Candidates must maintain the 2.5 GPA to be recommended for student teaching.
- Candidates must have a 2.5 GPA both in their major and overall to be recommended for licensure.
- Candidates must have a C or better in their education courses or risk needing to repeat them.
While candidate assessment is gathered at multiple data points, three gates are part of the formal assessment system:
- Gate 1: Acceptance to the program (usually during the sophomore year)
- Completion of application
- Self-dispositions
- Completion of entrance portfolio
- Entrance interview
- Letter of recommendation from content area faculty (secondary) or education faculty (elementary)
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 2: Application to student teaching (usually during the junior or senior year)
- Completion of 100 clinical hours (assigned, managed and reviewed in various courses)
- Completion of 2 micro-credentials (the diversity micro-credential is required and the other is at the discretion of the student)
- Student teaching application
- Approval by both the undergraduate department of education and teacher education committee (TEC)
- Gate 3: Recommendation for licensure (usually at the end of student teaching experience)
- Attendance of student teaching seminars
- Completion of exit portfolio
- Successful completion of student teaching experience
- Completion of student-teaching paperwork
- Completion of exit interview
- Approval by undergraduate department of education
Student data are also examined at informal assessment points including advising sessions each semester in which elementary candidates are assigned to an adviser in the department and secondary candidates are assigned to two advisers, one in their content area and one in secondary education.
Programmatic assessment
Programmatic assessment
Programmatic assessment
Programmatic assessment is gathered using candidate assessment for the base. That data is then analyzed, and a report is written and submitted by the department's assessment coordinator to Northwestern's Academic Program Assessment Committee (APAC). After receiving feedback from this committee, the report is then shared with the department and is used for data-driven decision-making regarding foci for the next academic year(s) at our end-of-year departmental meetings.
Once every seven years the program is reviewed by the Iowa Department of Education in order to maintain accreditation and to receive critical feedback on what we are doing well and where we have opportunities to improve and grow. Our last accreditation visit was in the spring of 2023. Our next will be during the 2029-2030 academic year.
Programmatic assessment is gathered using candidate assessment for the base. That data is then analyzed, and a report is written and submitted by the department's assessment coordinator to Northwestern's Academic Program Assessment Committee (APAC). After receiving feedback from this committee, the report is then shared with the department and is used for data-driven decision-making regarding foci for the next academic year(s) at our end-of-year departmental meetings.
Once every seven years the program is reviewed by the Iowa Department of Education in order to maintain accreditation and to receive critical feedback on what we are doing well and where we have opportunities to improve and grow. Our last accreditation visit was in the spring of 2023. Our next will be during the 2029-2030 academic year.
Programmatic assessment is gathered using candidate assessment for the base. That data is then analyzed, and a report is written and submitted by the department's assessment coordinator to Northwestern's Academic Program Assessment Committee (APAC). After receiving feedback from this committee, the report is then shared with the department and is used for data-driven decision-making regarding foci for the next academic year(s) at our end-of-year departmental meetings.
Once every seven years the program is reviewed by the Iowa Department of Education in order to maintain accreditation and to receive critical feedback on what we are doing well and where we have opportunities to improve and grow. Our last accreditation visit was in the spring of 2023. Our next will be during the 2029-2030 academic year.
The education department's assessment system addresses the work of the teacher education program as a whole: the elementary and secondary education majors. The special education major and education generalist major are still in their infancy and have no data yet to report. Program evaluation data includes feedback from student teachers, cooperating teachers, supervisors, first-year teachers and administrators of first-year teachers. Data is aggregated and examined annually. Program changes are proposed and made based on these data sets. Two years of APAC reports are available here:
- 2022-2023 APAC report
- 2023-2024 APAC report
Every year, Jeremy Penn—through a project funded with support from the Iowa Department of Education—conducts survey research of first-year teachers and their administrators on behalf of all teacher preparation programs in Iowa. The results are shared annually and are used by the program to make data-driven decisions and determine direction (in conjunction with our APAC results and feedback from our advisory team—a group of area teachers who act as a sounding board for us on ideas related to contemporary education). The 2023 results are located here.
3-year student loan default rate: 1.9%
Direct costs of attendance were $45,700 for 2023-24. The average financial aid package (minus loans) for Fall 2023 was $27,382, for an average out-of-pocket cost of $18,318.
Average beginning salary of a program completer: $44,281 for 2023 graduates responding to the Compass Center for Career & Calling survey sent to all graduates.
Placement patterns of completers: Results from the 2023 Compass Center for Career & Calling outcomes survey show that 68% of graduates were employed in Iowa. 90% were employed in Iowa or the surrounding states (SD and MN, in that order). Urban areas include Sioux Falls, Eagan and Council Bluffs. 100% of Northwestern education graduates are in the Midwest/neighboring states (IA, SD, MN and CO, in decreasing order). Most are working in smaller towns/school districts, with a few working in urban areas or larger school districts (such as Sioux Falls, Sioux City, Eagan and Denver).